中新网广元9月13日电 (苗志勇)13日晚，四川省广元市纪委监委通报了该市近期三起疫情防控工作落实不力典型问题，多名干部被处分，相关责任单位向广元市委市政府作出书面检查。8月21日，西安来广高风险人员张某某(后确诊为新冠肺炎轻型)抵达广元火车站后，广元火车站卡口未严格按照要求对其实施隔离管控和及时转运，造成两名工作人员感染。 Last week, the predominantly conservative US Supreme Court overruled the precedent established by the Roe v. Wade and decided that states may regulate the practice of abortion. The Roe v. Wade decision upheld pregnant women’s right to seek an abortion without government restrictions. A decision in the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey largely upheld the Roe ruling.,Effect on Midterms,In November, US citizens will go to the polls in what will be the first midterm election of the Joe Biden administration as well as a referendum of sorts on the current US president's performance. The Republicans have been projected to win back the House of Representatives and the Senate as well, as the public has been increasingly frustrated by the issues such as inflation, crime, education and jobs. The recent ruling, however, could potentially give the democrats a shot in the arm by generating excitement among their voters.,"It will certainly galvanize the Democrats' base, for sure, it will help them to raise campaign funds and it may - perhaps - make some races more difficult for Republicans, especially in the suburbs among women voters," Robert Singh, a professor of politics at Birkbeck, University of London, said, adding that most voters will still be focused on other issues and he still expects the Republicans to win both houses of the Congress.,This sentiment was echoed by Ziad Munson, a sociology professor and the chair of the department of sociology and anthropology at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, who also warned that the effect of the decision can be overstated.,"A consistent finding in political science over the last several decades is that the abortion issue, while a potent ideological symbol, seldom is a key policy issue for voters when they cast their votes," Munson explained.,Andrew Wroe, a senior lecturer in American politics at the University of Kent, agreed as well that the issue should help the Democrats, citing the effectiveness of the Republican use of cultural issues for rallying their base.,"The Democratic Party has been less successful in prosecuting the Culture Wars, but this is its great opportunity. Whether it will use it well is a different question, however," Wroe suggested.,At the same time, Christopher Kaczor, the chair of the philosophy department at Loyola Marymount University, is doubtful about the abortion issue having an impact on the US political landscape and helping Democrats to excite their voters.,"I expect that the very small minority of people for whom abortion is the key issue, on both sides, will be energized by this decision, but for most people other political and economic issues will remain more important," Kaczor stated.,New Wave of Protests?,The Supreme Court's decision has triggered a strong reaction on both sides of the issue in the United States, with hundreds of protesters, pro-life and pro-choice, gathering outside the Supreme Court last week following the decision. After the ruling, protests broke out in various US cities, showing a possibility of a nationwide backlash.,"People are angry, distraught, and ready to mobilise. It is difficult to say precisely how long the protests will persist, but it is likely to be some considerable time, given the magnitude of the policy change and the direct and indirect effects it will have on millions of people's lives," Wroe said.,Meanwhile, other experts expressed skepticism regarding the possibility of nationwide protests, including Munson, who drew attention to the fact that "the conservative majority tested for this possibility when they agreed not to stay the implementation of the Texas S.B. 8 law [also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act that bans abortion after detection of an unborn child's heartbeat] earlier this year.","Allowing that law to go into effect was the Court's political trial balloon, and it showed that widespread outrage quickly quieted down after just a few days. The outrage following the formal overturning of Roe v. Wade will last longer, but it is not likely to lead to large-scale consequential protest activity," the sociologist said.,Man Charged With Attempted Murder of LAPD Officers Amid Roe v Wade Protests26 June, 14:51 GMT,Who Judges the Justices?,Over the years, the role of courts in the US social and political life has greatly increased, with the Supreme Court becoming the final arbiter on many hot-button issues, such as same-sex marriage, gun control and abortion. This has been a prominent talking point among conservatives, who have been claiming that this practice undermines the country's constitutional principles, while liberals have been appealing to the notion of the courts standing up for human rights as well as drawing attention to the conservative movement's efforts to train and promote judges who share its principles.,"Both liberals and conservatives have always been supportive of judicial activism, they just want the judiciary to be activist in promoting the issues or outcomes that their side prefers. This despite the fact that conservatives have used 'judicial activism' as a talking point for some time," Munson pointed out.,Kaczor, for his part, drew a distinction between the original Roe decision and the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, insisting that the latter actually corrects a case of judicial activism.,"The Dobbs decision is not accurately portrayed as a case of judicial activism, but rather as the reversal of judicial activism. It was Roe that established a constitutional right for abortion that had no basis in the text, history, or structure of the constitution. The decision of Dobbs undoes this judicial activism," he stated.,Nevertheless, the ruling by the current Supreme Court, which has three justices picked up by former President Donald Trump from a list compiled by the conservative legal organization Federalist Society, is likely to have the Democrats sour on the Supreme Court.,"Democrats are increasingly likely to start talking about illegitimate policy making by the Supreme Court. They will start to complain about judicial activism. But, as noted above, they can use these arguments to mobilize their base and to argue for urgency of electing more Democrats to the Senate, which of course must ratify presidential appointments to the Court," Wroe said, adding that the Democrats can also "begin to legitimately argue that the Senate has an in-built Republican advantage that needs to be addressed via constitutional change.",According to Singh, any Democratic nominee for the 2024 presidential race will face the pressure to commit to enlarging and reforming the Supreme Court.,"Whether that happens, though, is another matter. I doubt the Democrats will have sufficient seats in the Senate to overcome a GOP filibuster of court reform proposals. But the fact that the conservatives number six now on the Court sets up an on-going problem for Democrats, and more conflict to come," Singh concluded.。广元市纪委给予广元火车站点长孙长江(市供销社党组成员、机关党委书记)党内严重警告处分。8月21日，新疆来川人员蔡某某(后被确诊为新冠病毒无症状感染者)抵达广元火车站等候闭环转运，卡口点长孙长江、工作人员刘小龙(市供销社社有企业科科长)将其交由负责青川转运工作的龚洪平(广运集团青川公司外聘人员)后未再过问，而龚洪平以其户籍地和目的地不在青川县域为由拒绝转运，导致蔡某某脱管失控，青川县城区因此实行临时性管控措施。广元市纪委给予孙长江党内严重警告处分(与前述问题合并处理)，将龚洪平涉嫌违法问题移交公安机关依法处理；广元市纪委监委驻市经济和信息化局纪检监察组对刘小龙批评教育；青川县纪委对牵头负责青川转运工作的青川县交通运输局党组书记、局长母国强批评教育，对安全总监敦春光予以诫勉。
8月24日，西藏那曲来川人员任某某(同车共4人)因出现发热等症状在广元南龙潭收费站卡口下高速，该卡口点长段明东(市人防办工作人员)请求广元市利州区卫健局党组成员、副局长张晋铭安排对其转运，张晋铭提出将4人劝返，段明东听从其建议未再请示报告，并将4人劝返，任某某改从剑门关收费站卡口下高速后确诊为新冠肺炎轻型，造成疫情传播风险。市纪委监委驻市应急管理局纪检监察组对段明东批评教育，利州区纪委给予张晋铭党内警告处分。上述三起事件，反映出交通运输部门在疫情防控工作中，统筹协调不力，培训指导不到位，市纪委对广元市交通运输局党组成员、副局长陈林河批评教育。同时，责成广元市交通运输局党组、广元市人防办党组、广元市供销社党组向市委、市政府作出书面检查。
Current article:http://enqbos0.kelozhaichongbaoshuo.pics/2e4jbw2/20260826/93886.html
Published on:00:18:35
